Notley claims victory in the courts, but opponents of the Kinder Morgan Trans Mountain Pipeline are not going to just disappear.

Another victory for our economy. Another victory for our climate plan. Another victory for the pipeline and another victory for all Albertans and all Canadians,” was the message Alberta Premier Rachel Notley reportedly delivered at a press conference in St. Albert. Notley was of course referring to the decision by the Federal Court of Appeal to dismiss the British Columbia government’s bid to challenge a National Energy Board ruling allowing Kinder Morgan Inc. to bypass City of Burnaby bylaws meant to block the expansion of the corporation’s Trans Mountain Pipeline.

As Kinder Morgan and its supporters in government in Edmonton and Ottawa are racking up the legal and regulatory wins in this pipeline dispute, losses in the courts might do little to stop opposition to the pipeline.

Opponents of the pipeline, including Burnaby Mayor Derek Corrigan, have said that despite the court ruling they will continue to oppose the pipeline. In a demonstration of non-violent civil disobedience last Friday, Green Party leader Elizabeth May and Burnaby-South NDP MP Kennedy Stewart were arrested by RCMP for protesting in a court determined no-protest zone outside of Kinder Morgan’s terminal in Burnaby.

South of the border, a Massachusetts judge ruled that more than a dozen protesters who blocked the construction of a gas pipeline were “not responsible” after they argued their actions to try and stop climate change were a legal “necessity.” I do not know if a similar outcome would be possible in Canadian courts, but I suspect we will begin to hear some of the same arguments in the coming months.

In the chambers of parliament in Ottawa, the Senate unanimously adopted a motion introduced by BC Conservative Senator Richard Neufeld urging Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to “bring the full weight and power of his office to ensure that Kinder Morgan’s Trans Mountain Expansion Project gets completed on schedule.” This week, Independent Senator Doug Black of Calgary introduced Bill S-245, the Trans Mountain Pipeline Project Act, which would declare the pipeline “to be works for the general advantage of Canada.”

It is not clear what Neufeld believes “the full weight and power” of the Prime Minister’s Office includes, but aside from Trudeau sending in the Army or suspending constitutional rights of Canadians, we should expect the protests to intensify. The Trudeau government in Ottawa has been clear about its support for the pipeline, but the political calculus, including the 18 incumbent Liberal MPs in British Columbia, has meant most federal pressure on the BC government is likely being applied behind the scenes.

Notley was right to point out the contradiction in the BC government’s position opposing the Kinder Morgan pipeline while trying to jump-start the west coast liquid natural gas industry. Just as Albertans have discovered in this pipeline dispute, provincial governments can sometimes be much more sympathetic to their own local industries than the opinions of neighbouring provinces.

There are contradictions on both sides of this debate.

Opponents of the pipeline are happy to point out the conflicting messages sent by Notley’s government, which pushes the expansion of an oilsands pipeline while lauding its Climate Leadership Plan. The success of the oil pipeline has been made central to the Alberta NDP government’s political future, The awkward shoehorning of the pipeline issue into the provincial budget was the most recent example.

It feels unlikely this issue will be resolved anytime soon and, despite rulings in the courts, opponents of Kinder Morgan’s Trans Mountain Pipeline will likely get louder and more determined before the pipeline is expanded, if ever.

4 thoughts on “Notley claims victory in the courts, but opponents of the Kinder Morgan Trans Mountain Pipeline are not going to just disappear.

  1. Jerrymacgp

    There are clearly people in the Lower Mainland who will lie down in front of a bulldozer rather than see one metre of pipeline built, and there’s no court in the land that can dissuade them. I’m not sure how, short of posting armed soldiers along the pipeline route (not a strategy most Canadians would want to see) , one can get this thing built in the face of that kind of opposition. And yet, the fate of the Notley-led NDP government, and many of the positive things it has accomplished— farm worker safety, better labour laws, better consumer protection, a living minimum wage, etc. etc.—will live or die on that pipeline.

    Getting shovels in the ground on TMX doesn’t guarantee an NDP victory next year, but if it remains stalled, you can write them off as soon as the writ drops. And you can bet your sweet bippy that a Jason Kenney government’s Bill 1 will be to repeal the carbon tax and the Climate Leadership Plan.

    It’s all very frustrating.

    Reply
    1. Conrad

      Yes I agree. Seeing the province’s economy going down the tubes as a result of the carbon tax, income tax increases, minimum wage increases, corporate tax increases, and needless royalty review has been very frustrating.

      Kenney’s Bill 1 can’t come soon enough.

      Reply
  2. David

    There is a lot of economic angst and frustration by many Albertans related to the construction of the Trans Mountain Pipeline. It doesn’t help that three other previous major pipelines have died or been killed in the last several years, although one has now been revived.

    Therefore, I am sure many Albertans do wish that the protestors would just go away, they are perceived perhaps not incorrectly as a threat to our economy and economic well being. However, I don’t think that is the same as expecting them to go away. No major project ever has unanimous consent and I expect this one certainly will not either.

    The protestors do have a right to protest and they have their own valid concerns. However, they do not have a right to obstruct something which has gone through a lengthy and complex approval process, which considered and weighed the competing interests. It will be choppy waters, but Alberta needs to keep a cool and steady hand here. If it does, I expect the outcome will eventually be what most Albertans want.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.